(PS) Goode v. St. Jude Medical, et al, No. 2:2008cv00302 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/29/10 ORDERING that the proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 11/16/09 23 are ADOPTED; Defendants' MOTIONS to DISMISS 8 and 9 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 4 is DISMISSED with leave to file a second Amended Complaint, in conformance with the Findings and Recommendations filed 11/16/09, within 60 days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PS) Goode v. St. Jude Medical, et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY GOODE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:08-cv-00302 MCE EFB PS vs. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, TWEED HANUSEK, BILL HILTON, ST. JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC, RUTH GAGARIN, IRMA ESTRADA, BRIDGET FELLOWS, NICOLE ARANA, NES KUSNIERZ, KATHY CHESTER, ST JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC RHYTHM MANAGEMENT and DOES 1-20, et al., ORDER 18 19 Defendants. __________________________________/ 20 On November 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. 23 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 24 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 1983). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 16, 2009, are 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Dckt. Nos. 8 and 9, are granted in part and denied in part as set forth in the findings and recommendations; and 3. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Dckt. No. 4, is dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint, in conformance with the findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2009, within 60 days. Dated: January 29, 2010 12 13 14 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.