Pulera v. F&B Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/28/2011 ORDERING that the 45 application for shortening time is GRANTED. The hearing on the 46 Motion to Withdraw as attorney of record, noticed on June 16, 2011 for July 28, 2011, is advanced to July 14, 2011 at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Opposition due 7/6/11; Reply due 7/11/11. Proof of service of the motion and this order and must be filed no later than July 6, 2011.(Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO
12
13
CASE NO: 08 CV 00275-MCE-DAD
ANTHONY J. PULERA,
14
Plaintiff,
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
15
16
17
18
19
vs.
F & B, INC., MANCHESTER
ENTERPRISES, INC., CHARLENA
MANCHESTER, CHARLES
MANCHESTER, and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
20
21
22
Date:
Time:
Dept: 7/15th Fl
Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr.
F & B, INC., MANCHESTER
ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Third Party Plaintiffs,
23
24
vs.
25
TW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
26
Third Party Defendants.
27
28
-1Order Shortening Time
1
Having read and considered the application requesting an order shortening time for a
2
hearing on Attorney TORY M. PANKOPF's motion to withdrawal as attorney of record (the
3
"Motion"), and good cause appearing therefore,
4
5
1. The application is granted.
6
2. The hearing on the Motion, noticed on June 16, 2011 for July 28, 2011, is advanced to
7
July 14, 2011 at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 7 of the above entitled court.
8
3. All papers opposing the motion must be filed and served no later than July 6, 2011.
9
5. Any reply papers must be filed and served not later than July 11, 2011
6. Proof of service of the motion and this order and must be filed no later than July 6,
10
11
12
2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATE: June 28, 2011
15
16
17
______________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Order Shortening Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?