-EFB (PC) Jones v. Betti et al, No. 2:2008cv00096 - Document 120 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/28/11 ADOPTING in full 114 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 98 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiffs claims against defendants Betti, Brautingham,Callison, Hunter and Cunningham are dismissed without prejudice; GRANTING 109 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiffs claims against defendant Felker are dismissed without prejudice. (Williams, D)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Jones v. Betti et al Doc. 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALIK JONES, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-08-0096 KJM EFB P T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 11, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the 22 findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and 23 recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 25 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 2 by proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2011, are adopted in 5 6 full; 2. The motion to dismiss filed on September 10, 2010 by defendants Betti, 7 Brautingham, Callison, Hunter and Cunningham (Docket No. 98) is granted, and plaintiff’s 8 claims against defendants Betti, Brautingham, Callison, Hunter and Cunningham are dismissed 9 without prejudice; and 10 3. The motion to dismiss filed on November 18, 2010 by defendant Felker 11 (Docket No. 109) is granted, and plaintiff’s claims against defendant Felker are dismissed 12 without prejudice. 13 14 SO ORDERED. DATED: March 28, 2011. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.