(PC) Armstrong v. Garcia et al, No. 2:2008cv00039 - Document 102 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/15/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for an extension of time to file objections to findings and recommendations 101 is DENIED; the findings and recommendations 97 are ADOPTED in full; and Defendant Gellete is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Armstrong v. Garcia et al Doc. 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADY K. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-08-0039 FCD KJM P SILVEA GARCIA, Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On April 27, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On May 28, 2010, 23 plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file objections. However, that request is not 24 timely and plaintiff has not provided an adequate basis under Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of 25 Civil Procedure for the court to excuse plaintiff’s delay. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 1 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate 4 5 judge’s April 27, 2010 findings and recommendations is denied; 2. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2010, are adopted in full; 6 7 8 9 and 3. Defendant Gellete is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: June 15, 2010. 10 11 12 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
