Ryles v. Felker et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Richard C. Tallman on 05/24/10 ORDERING that dft W. Patton is ordered to respond to the the 38 Discovery request by 06/01/10, unless a response has already been provided to the plf. If a response has previously been pr ovided, a brief status report to that effect shall be filed by 06/01/10. The parties are reminded that all pretrial motions, including dispositive motions, shall be filed by 06/01/10; the response to a motion filed 06/01/10, shall be filed by 06/22/10; any reply is then due 06/29/10 and the motion shall be considered submitted 06/29/10 or the date the reply is filed, whichever comes first. The motion shall be submitted on the record, without oral argument. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Ryles filed a Motion for Discovery on April 9, 2010 (Dkt. #38). No response has been filed with the court. Defendant W. Patton is ordered to respond to the discovery request by June 1, 2010, unless a response has already been provided to the Plaintiff. If a response has previously been provided, a brief status report to that effect shall be filed on or before June 1, 2010. The parties are reminded that all pretrial motions, including dispositive motions, shall be filed on or before June 1, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(l), the response to a motion filed June 1, 2010, shall be filed on or before June 22, 2010. Any reply is then due June 29, 2010. The motion shall be considered submitted June 29, 2010, or the date the reply is filed, whichever comes first. The motion shall be submitted on the record, without oral argument. // // // vs. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER AMOS RYLES, Plaintiff, 2:07-cv-02753-RCT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The parties are further reminded that a failure to respond to a pretrial motion may be "deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion." Local Rule 78-230(l). IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 24th day of May, 2010.
/s/ Richard C. Tallman UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Sitting by designation
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
