Grant v. Swartzinager et al
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/7/11 ORDERING that Factual Discovery Cut-Off is due 3/1/12, Expert Designations & Reports 3/29/12, Rebuttal Designations & Reports 4/26/12, Expert Discovery Cut-Off 5/24/12, Pre-Trial Motion Cut-Off (motions to be filed by) 7/26/12, Pre Trial Conference 10/30/12, Trial 12/3/12. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL CASTRO, State Bar No. 85452
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ELIZABETH A. LINTON, State Bar No. 231619
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 323-8549
Fax: (916) 324-5567
E-mail: Elizabeth.Linton@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for CA Dept. of Mental Health
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
GREGORY D. GRANT,
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING
ORDER
14
v.
15
16
07-CV-2700-KJM-JFM
SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL.,
17
Action Filed: Dec. 14, 2007
Defendant.
18
19
On October 11, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit a proposed schedule or
20
21
request a further status conference. The parties have met and conferred and hereby submit this
22
proposed schedule for future deadlines.
23
The court previously ordered, per the parties’ stipulation, the case bifurcated and all
24
discovery stayed other than that related to the statute of limitations issue.1 (Dkt # 38.) In light of
25
this previous bifurcation, the parties will need to conduct both factual and expert discovery in the
26
case.
27
28
1
In the interest of efficiency, Mr. Grant’s deposition was not limited solely to the statute
of limitations issue.
1
Stipulation & Scheduling Order (07-CV-2700-KJM-JFM)
1
Per the parties’ previous stipulation and the Court’s order, all discovery will comply with
2
time limits set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rather than the time-frames set forth
3
in the Court’s original scheduling order dated April 6, 2010 (which was issued when Mr. Grant
4
was appearing pro se). (DKT ## 29, 36.)
5
6
Plaintiff also requests that the Court consider setting a date for the pretrial conference and
trial. Accordingly, the parties propose the following new dates for the scheduling order:
7
8
Event
Proposed Deadline
9
Factual Discovery Cut-Off
March 1, 2012
10
Expert Designations & Reports
March 29, 2012
11
Rebuttal Designations & Reports
April 26, 2012
12
Expert Discovery Cut-Off
May 24, 2012
13
Pre-Trial Motion Cut-Off (motions to be filed by)
July 26, 2012
Pre –Trial Conference
October 30, 2012
Trial
December 3, 2012
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation & Scheduling Order (07-CV-2700-KJM-JFM)
1
Dated: October 26, 2012
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL CASTRO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
2
3
4
___/s/ Elizabeth Linton_____________
ELIZABETH A. LINTON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for CA Dept. of Mental Health
5
6
7
Dated: October 26, 2012
8
9
/s/ Joe Ramsey, Esq.
(as authorized on 10/26/2012)_______
JOE RAMSEY, ESQ.
Attorney for Gregory Grant
10
11
12
15
After review of the stipulation of the parties and consideration of the district court’s calendar, and
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulated dates for completion of
factual discovery, expert and rebuttal designations and reports, completion of expert discovery,
and filing of pretrial motions are all approved. Pretrial conference is set for October 31, 2012 at
11:00 a.m. before the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller in Courtroom #3. The parties shall file a
joint pretrial statement on or before October 17, 2012. Jury trial is set for December 3, 2012 at
9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller in Courtroom #3.
16
Dated: November 7, 2011.
13
14
17
18
19
/gran2700.so
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation & Scheduling Order (07-CV-2700-KJM-JFM)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
