(PC) Jayne v. Anderson Police Dept., et al, No. 2:2007cv02522 - Document 134 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/12/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 130 2010, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 126 is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jayne v. Anderson Police Dept., et al Doc. 134 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL AARON JAYNE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:07cv2522 LKK KJN P vs. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.,et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 2, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 2, 2010, are adopted in full. 2 2. Plaintiff’s May 24, 2010, motion for injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 126) is denied 3 without prejudice. 4 DATED: July 12, 2010. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
