-CMK (PC) Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al, No. 2:2007cv01902 - Document 95 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/16/11 ordering plaintiff is granted 30 additional days in which to file objections to the pending findings and recommendations. The parties may file objections within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
-CMK (PC) Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE PAMER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. CIV S-07-1902-MCE-CMK-P vs. ORDER 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to stay these proceedings 19 (Doc. 94). Plaintiff indicates he is currently in administrative segregation, is without his 20 medication and legal files, and that his legal files may have been lost. He is therefore requesting 21 this court stay these proceedings until such time as his situation improves. 22 The court does not find a stay of proceedings necessary at this time. However, 23 given petitioner’s current situation, the court will extend the time he has to file his objections to 24 the pending findings and recommendations, which recommend defendants’ motion to dismiss be 25 granted and plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. If plaintiff finds he is unable 26 to respond to the pending findings and recommendations within the time provided herein, he may 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 submit another motion for additional time, upon a showing of good cause. Plaintiff is cautioned, 2 however, that detention in administrative segregation alone is insufficient reason for prolonged 3 extensions of time. While the court may entertain additional requests for more time as needed, 4 the court is unwilling to allow this case to languish. Only those requests which actually 5 demonstrate good cause will be granted. 6 Good cause appearing therefore, plaintiff is granted 30 additional days in which to 7 file objections to the pending findings and recommendations. The parties may file objections 8 within 30 days of the date of this order. The parties are reminded that failure to file objections 9 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal any order adopting the findings and 10 11 recommendations. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 DATED: February 16, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.