(PC) Watson v. Sisto, et al, No. 2:2007cv01871 - Document 94 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/22/10 vacating 92 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Amended findings and recommendations will be filed in due course.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Watson v. Sisto, et al Doc. 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NYLES LAWAYNE WATSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:07-cv-01871 LKK KJN P D.K. SISTO et al., 14 15 Defendants. ORDER ____________________________/ 16 In light of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Rhodes v. Robinson, ___F.3d___, 2010 17 WL 3489777 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2010), the court vacates its findings and recommendations in this 18 action filed on September 3, 2010 (Dkt. No. 92) for further consideration. Amended findings 19 and recommendations will be filed in due course. 20 21 SO ORDERED. DATED: September 22, 2010 22 23 24 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
