Boutte v. Brown, et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Chief Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski on 6/27/11 GRANTING Petitioner's request for discovery on the subjects specified on page 5 of petitioner's Reply to Respondent's Answer to Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In accordance with Rule 6, the court limits discovery to those subjects and to six months, beginning 8/1/11. (Becknal, R)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DONALD STEPHEN BOUTTE,
Plaintiff,
No. 2:07-cv-01508-AK
v.
ORDER
BROWN, Warden,
Defendant.
Petitioner has established good cause for discovery under Rule 6 of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts as
construed in Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899 (1997). The court therefore grants
petitioner’s request for discovery on the subjects specified on page 5 of
petitioner’s Reply to Respondent’s Answer to Amended Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus. In accordance with Rule 6, the court limits discovery to those
subjects and to six months, beginning August 1, 2011.
June 27, 2011
A
ALEX KOZINSKI
Chief Circuit Judge
Sitting by designation
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
