(PC) Elmore v. Arong et al, No. 2:2007cv01463 - Document 70 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/10 ORDERING that the 69 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; the 48 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Defts Maxham, Moreno, Rendon, and Perfino. (Owen, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Elmore v. Arong et al Doc. 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONIE ELMORE, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:07-cv-1463 WBS KJN P ARONG, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 21, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 21, 2010, are adopted in full. 2 2. The motion for summary judgment filed September 11, 2009 on behalf of 3 defendants Maxham, Moreno, Rendon and Perfino is granted. 4 DATED: June 23, 2010 5 6 7 8 9 10 /elmo1463.801 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
