McDaniel v. Hubbard et al
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/04/10 ordering defendants shall address the issue of exhaustion as to defendants Cueva, Hall and Swan on or before 03/18/10. Plaintiff shall file a response no later than 2 weeks thereafter. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. S. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLIFTON JEROME MCDANIEL, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1189 JAM JFM (PC)
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on three claims: an excessive force claim against defendant Cobbs; a deliberate indifference to conditions of confinement claim against defendant Carson; and a cover-up claim against defendants Cueva, Hall and Swan. On November 9, 2009, defendants Cueva, Hall and Swan filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). Review of the pleadings reveals a question as to whether plaintiff exhausted his state remedies with regard to defendants Cueva, Hall and Swan. See Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// ///// 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
014.mcda1189.exh
1. Defendants shall address the issue of exhaustion as to defendants Cueva, Hall and Swan on or before March 18, 2010; and 2. Plaintiff shall file a response no later than two weeks thereafter. DATED: March 4, 2010.
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
