(PC) Crittenden v. Mitzel et al, No. 2:2007cv01013 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/5/2008 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 1/10/2008, are adopted in full; Dfts' 9/27/2007 motion for involuntary dismissal is PARTIALLY GRANTED; Pltf's 5/29/2007 application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and w/in 20 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the filing fee of $350.00. Failure to timely pay this fee will result in the dismissal of this action.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Crittenden v. Mitzel et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EDWARD CRITTENDEN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 2:07-cv-1013-GEB-JFM-P J. MITZEL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On January 10, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 10, 2008, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ September 27, 2007 motion for involuntary dismissal is partially 3 granted; 4 5 6 7 3. Plaintiff’s May 29, 2007 application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and 4. Within twenty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the filing fee of $350.00. Failure to timely pay this fee will result in the dismissal of this action. 8 9 Dated: February 5, 2008 10 11 12 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.