(HC) Ramos v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2007cv00868 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/25/10 recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as moot. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Ramos v. Sisto et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AVELINO RAMOS, 12 No. CIV S-07-0868-JAM-CMK-P Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 D.K. SISTO, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this petition 18 for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the denial of parole. 19 Respondent notified the court that Petitioner has been granted parole and released from custody. 20 On July 15, 2010, the undersigned issued an order for Petitioner to show cause in writing, within 21 30 days, why his petition should not be dismissed as moot. No response has been received. 22 23 Based on Petitioner’s release from custody, the undersigned finds that this action is moot in that there is no relief on Petitioner’s petition which the court can now grant. 24 Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Petitioner’s petition for 25 writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of 5 objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. 6 See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 8 9 10 DATED: August 25, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
