(PC) Chatman v. Felker, et. al., No. 2:2006cv02912 - Document 47 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/28/2010 ORDERING 45 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; and 34 Motion to Dismiss is denied.(Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Chatman v. Felker, et. al. Doc. 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES CHATMAN, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2912 LKK EFB P vs. TOM FELKER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 31, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 23 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 1 26 Defendants did not file objections to the findings and recommendations and filed their answer to the amended complaint on September 13, 2010. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 ORDERED that: 2 3 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied. DATED: September 28, 2010. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
