(PC) Meyer v. Schwarzenegger et al, No. 2:2006cv02584 - Document 95 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/30/10 on 8/27/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 93 ADOPTED IN FULL; dffts' motion for summary judgment 80 GRANTED; and this case is CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Meyer v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RUSSELL MEYER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-06-2584 LKK GGH P vs. 13 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 20, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket #80) is granted, and this 3 case is closed. 4 DATED: August 30, 2010. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
