Robidoux et al v Wacker Family Trust et al
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/6/11 ORDERING plaintiffs to file a new proposed settlement within fourteen (14) days of the issuanceof this order, for the court's review under the standard set out by the Ninth Circuit. Any opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed not later than ten (10) days thereafter. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
JESSE ROBIDOUX; REGINA
ROBIDOUX; RANDALL
REICHEBERG, JR. and JESSE J.
ROBIDOUX, JR., minors by and
through their GUARDIAN AD
LITEM, REGINA ROBIDOUX; SHAUN
JOHNSON; LORENA LINGENFELTER;
HANNAH BURK and MICHAEL BURK,
minors by and through their
GUARDIAN AD LITEM, LORENA
LINGENFELTER, individuals,
15
NO. CIV.S-06-2334 LKK/DAD
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
O R D E R
WACKER FAMILY TRUST; WAYNE
WACKER, EILEEN WACKER and
CHRISTINE WACKER, individually
and doing business as VILLA
SERRANO APARTMENTS; BRIAN
ROSENGREN,
21
Defendants.
22
/
23
On April 21, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in the
24
above-referenced matter. The mandate directed the district court
25
to determine whether the net recovery of the four minor plaintiffs
26
under the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable as to each
1
1
minor plaintiff. Accordingly, the court ORDERS plaintiffs to file
2
a new proposed settlement within fourteen (14) days of the issuance
3
of this order, for the court’s review under the standard set out
4
by the Ninth Circuit. Any opposition or statement of non-opposition
5
shall be filed not later than ten (10) days thereafter.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED:
June 6, 2011.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?