Washington v Brown, et al
Filing
148
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/16/11 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition.(Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JESSE WASHINGTON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:06-cv-1994 WBS DAD (PC)
J. BROWN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
On October 13, 2011, defendants filed a renewed motion for judgment on the
17
pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Plaintiff has not opposed the
18
motion.
19
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
20
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
21
the granting of the motion . . . .” On July 15, 2009, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for
22
filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
23
waiver of opposition to the motion.
24
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
25
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
26
inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed July 15, 2009, plaintiff was advised
1
1
that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be
2
dismissed.
3
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the
4
date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a
5
statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation
6
that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
7
DATED: November 16, 2011.
8
9
10
11
DAD:12
wash1994.46o
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
