Washington v Brown, et al
Filing
118
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/5/10 DENYING 113 Motion for protective order as moot. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J. BROWN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for a protective order. In his motion, plaintiff seeks a court order requiring the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kern Valley State Prison, California State Prison - Sacramento, and California State Prison - Solano to retrieve and deliver to him three boxes of his legal materials. According to plaintiff, he needs the sought-after boxes of materials to prepare his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Shortly after plaintiff filed his motion for a protective order, he informed the court that he had received his three boxes of legal materials. Plaintiff also filed his opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment, which this court deemed timely in a previous order. Under these circumstances, the court will deny plaintiff's motion for a protective order as moot. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1994 WBS DAD P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 wash1994.po
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a protective order (Doc. No. 113) is denied as moot. DATED: March 5, 2010.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
