-EFB (PC) Oliver v. Carey et al, No. 2:2006cv00390 - Document 108 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/29/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 8/23/11 104 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants Noriega's and Mahmoud's 1/21/11 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 91 is GRANTED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Oliver v. Carey et al Doc. 108 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES OLIVER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-06-0390 MCE EFB P vs. TOM CAREY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the 22 date the findings and recommendations were served. After an extension of time, plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 23, 2011 (ECF 104), are 5 6 7 ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants Noriega’s and Mahmoud’s January 21, 2011 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 8 9 Dated: September 29, 2011 10 11 12 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
