Cartwright v. University of California at Davis
Filing
216
STIPULATION of Partial Dismissal with prejudice signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/26/2010. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805) MARK S. POSARD (SBN: 208790) GORDON & REES, LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Twentieth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 986-5900 Facsimile:(415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and SAL GENITO III DANIEL M. KARALASH (SBN 176422) Law Offices of Daniel M. Karalash 1207 Front Street, Suite 15 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 787-1234 Fax: (916) 787-0267 dankaralash@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff Employee EDITH CARTWRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDITH CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 05 02439 MCE-KJM STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER Trial Date: March 29, 2009 Time: 9:00 AM Courtroom: 7
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(i), the parties hereby STIPULATE to the dismissal of the following causes of action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees: 1. 2. 3. 4. Second Cause of Action for violation of California Civil Code § 52.1; Third Cause of Action for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985; Fifth Cause of Action for discrimination under 20 U.S.C. § 1681; Sixth Cause of Action for discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; 1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO.: CV 05 02439 MCE-KJM
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1
5. 6. 7. 8. 9. § 17200; 10.
Seventh Cause of Action for discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; Ninth Cause of Action for Conversion; Tenth Cause of Action for Interference with Business; Twelfth Cause of Action for Invasion of Privacy; Fourteenth Cause of Action for violation of Business & Professions Code
Fifteenth Cause of Action for Negligent Hiring, Negligent Retention and
Negligent Supervision. For the trial in this matter, the parties agree that the right of action is retaliation for protected activity in the Federal claims. Only the following claims shall remain1: A. B. C. First Cause of Action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sal Genito; Fifth Cause of Action for retaliation under 20 U.S.C. § 1681 against the Regents; Sixth Cause of Action for retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against the Regents
and Sal Genito; D. Regents; E. F. Genito. Eleventh Cause of Action for Defamation against Sal Genito; Thirteenth Cause of Action for Intentionally Causing Injury (IIED) against Sal Seventh Cause of Action for retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e against the
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated: March 25, 2010
GORDON & REES, LLP
By: _____/s/ Mark S. Posard____ Mark S. Posard Attorneys for Defendants
All other parties and causes of action have been dismissed via Defendants' two 12(b)(6) motions.
2 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO.: CV 05 02439 MCE-KJM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UCD/1014716/7716071v.1
Dated: March 25, 2010
LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL M. KARALASH
By: _____/s/ Daniel M. Karalash_ Daniel M. Karalash Attorney for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO.: CV 05 02439 MCE-KJM
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
