-EFB (PC) Davis v. Woodford et al, No. 2:2005cv01898 - Document 35 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/5/2011 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiffs claims against CDCR and various defendants for violating regulations contained within title 15 of the California Code of Regulations are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Michel, G)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Davis v. Woodford et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES T. DAVIS, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-05-1898 JAM EFB P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 7, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s claims against CDCR and various defendants for violating 4 regulations contained within title 15 of the California Code of Regulations are dismissed without 5 leave to amend. 6 DATED: October 5, 2011 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
