Lewis, et al v. Russell, et al
Filing
350
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/7/2011 ORDERING 349 that the action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED as against defendant Vic Manufacturing Company only, with prejudice; that the dismissal is expressly conditioned upon the terms and conditions of that certain Mutual Release of Claims entered into by and between Lewis and Vic having an Effective Date of 11/1/2011 (the "Release"); that the Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for the sole purpose of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of the Release; and that each of the parties hereto shall bear its own costs, including attorney's fees, as provided in the Release. VIC Manufacturing Company. (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
S. Craig Hunter, CA State Bar No. 125247
Attorney At Law
PO Box 13810
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Tel: (805) 544-4980
email: craighunterlaw@sbcglobal.net
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Charles H. Lewis and Jane W. Lewis (Deceased)
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROBERT D. RUSSELL; et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
AND RELATED COUNTER, CROSS AND )
THIRD PARTY CLAIMS.
)
)
CHARLES H. LEWIS, et al.,
Case No. CIV. S-03-2646 WBS CKD
STIPULATION FOR
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
[FRCP 41(a)(2)]
[Proposed]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Charles H. Lewis, on behalf of himself and for Jane W. Lewis, Deceased
20
(“Lewis”), and defendant Vic Manufacturing Company, a dissolved Minnesota corporation
21
(“Vic”), through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate to an order of the above-entitled
22
Court dismissing the above-entitled action, as against Vic only, with prejudice, according to the
23
terms of a Mutual Release of Claims (the “Release”), having an “Effective Date” of November 1,
24
2011, entered into by and between Lewis and Vic.
25
26
27
28
Dated: November _1___, 2011.
/s/
S. Craig Hunter
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Charles H. Lewis and
Jane W. Lewis (Deceased)
-1-
Stipulation for Order of Dismissal of Defendant Vic Manufacturing Company.; [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
1
Dated: November _2___, 2011.
WEYAND LAW FIRM
2
By: /s/
Paul P. DeAngelis
Attorneys for Vic Manufacturing Company,
a dissolved Minnesota corporation
3
4
5
6
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
8
The Court, having reviewed and considered the stipulation set forth above, and good
9
cause appearing therefor:
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed,
11
as against defendant Vic Manufacturing Company only, with prejudice.
12
IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal is expressly conditioned upon
13
the terms and conditions of that certain Mutual Release of Claims entered into by and between
14
Lewis and Vic having an Effective Date of November 1, 2011 (the “Release”).
15
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction of this matter
16
for the sole purpose of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of the Release.
17
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that each of the parties hereto shall bear its
18
own costs, including attorney’s fees, as provided in the Release.
19
20
21
Dated: November 7, 2011
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Stipulation for Order of Dismissal of Defendant Vic Manufacturing Company.; [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
