(HC) Martin v. Hubbard, et al, No. 2:1999cv00223 - Document 124 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/10/10 RECOMMENDING that a temporary stay of proceedings in this court be granted pending the outcome of respondents petition for writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Martin v. Hubbard, et al Doc. 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES MARTIN, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-99-0223 WBS GGH P vs. S.L. HUBBARD, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 In response to the order, filed on April 27, 2010, directing the parties to inform the 17 undersigned as to the status of respondent’s application for a writ of certiorari, counsel for both 18 parties confirm respondent filed a petition for a writ of cert. on February 17, 2010, with a 19 response due from petitioner on May 19, 2010. Counsel mutually seek a temporary stay of 20 proceedings in the district court while the petition for writ of certiorari is being briefed and 21 considered. 22 Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that a temporary stay of proceedings in 23 this court be granted pending the outcome of respondent’s petition for writ of certiorari before 24 the United States Supreme Court. 25 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 4 shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are 5 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 6 District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 DATED: May 10, 2010 8 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 9 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GGH:009 mart0223.sta 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.