(HC) (DP) Hawkins v. Wong, No. 2:1996cv01155 - Document 234 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/27/11 ORDERING that by 6/14/11, each party shall file a brief on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, on petitioners motion for an evidentiary hearing and the findings and recommendations issued thereon, including particularly (but without limitation), Claims A, B, P, R, and W.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF

(HC) (DP) Hawkins v. Wong Doc. 234 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY JAY HAWKINS, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 vs. ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, DEATH PENALTY CASE Respondent. ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-96-1155 MCE EFB By June 14, 2011, each party shall file a brief on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 17 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary 18 hearing and the findings and recommendations issued thereon, including particularly (but 19 without limitation), Claims A, B, P, R, and W. 20 DATED: May 27, 2011. 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.