(PC) Lee v. Matevousian, No. 1:2018cv00278 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER REVOKING 4 Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis and ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Pay the $400 Filing Fee In Full Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/12/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO ANTON LEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. MATEVOUSIAN, 15 Defendant. Case No. 1:18-cv-00278-JLT (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS (Docs. 4, 14) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 21 22 23 On November 13, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 25 26 27 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: //// 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 13, 2018 (Doc. 14), are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is revoked (Doc. 4); and 3. Plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing fee in full within thirty days from the date of this Order. Failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ December 12, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.