(PC) Hunt v. Matevousian, et al., No. 1:2015cv01457 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING Claims and Defendants 11 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/2/16: Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief filed on November 30, 2015, is denied as premature. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE HUNT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. A. MATEVOUSIAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No. 1:15-cv-01457-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (Doc No. 11) Plaintiff Maurice Hunt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agent, 403 U.S. 377 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 2, 2015, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings 21 and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s November 30, 2015 motion for injunctive relief 22 be denied. Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that 23 objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings 24 and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and 27 recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on December 2, 2015, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief filed on November 30, 2015, is denied as 4 premature. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 February 2, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.