(PC) Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. Trumbly et al, No. 1:2014cv00706 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and 37 Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Server the Unrelated Claims and Open a New Action signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/10/2016. (Flores, E)

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. K. TRUMBLY et al., 15 Defendants. 16 No. 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SEVER THE UNRELATED CLAIMS AND OPEN A NEW ACTION (Doc. Nos. 30, 31, 37, 38, 39) 17 18 19 At the time this action was filed, plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee 20 proceeding pro se with this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On 21 November 3, 2015, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint pursuant to 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915 and found that plaintiff’s complaint stated a cognizable claim for damages against 23 defendants Cosby and S. Valley for use of excessive force and failure to protect with respect to an 24 incident which took place on January 16, 2009, and a separate but unrelated claim against 25 defendants Redding and Blanco for use of excessive force and failure to protect with respect to an 26 27 28 1 Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 1 1 incident which took place on January 31, 2011. (Doc. No. 31 at 5.)2 The court found that the 2 second amended complaint did not state any other cognizable claims for relief against any other 3 individuals. (Doc. No. 31 at 5.) The court ordered plaintiff to either file a third amended 4 complaint curing the deficiencies identified therein or to notify the court that he was willing to 5 proceed only on one of the claims found to be cognizable. (Id. at 6.) On January 12, 2016, 6 plaintiff filed a notice stating he was willing to proceed only on his cognizable Fourteenth 7 Amendment claims and, further, that he did not intend to amend his complaint to attempt to state 8 claims against other individuals. (Doc. No. 37.) 9 On January 13, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 10 recommending that this action proceed only on plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims against 11 defendants Redding and Blanco. (Doc. No. 38.) The findings and recommendations were served 12 on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff 13 Shehee filed objections on February 1, 2016. (Doc. No. 39.) In his objections, plaintiff indicates 14 that he intends to proceed on both of his claims found cognizable by the court—i.e., against 15 defendants Cosby and S. Valley relating to the January 16, 2009 incident, and against defendants 16 Redding and Blanco relating to the January 31, 2011 incident.3 (Id.) 17 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 18 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the assigned 19 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to be supported by proper analysis. However, 20 the court will grant plaintiff’s request proceed on both of his claims found to be cognizable under 21 the Fourteenth Amendment by the magistrate judge. Under Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil 22 Procedure, “[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a 23 party. The court may also sever any claim against a party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. See also Davis v. 24 2 25 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). 26 3 27 28 In his objections, plaintiff also requests that he be able to proceed against defendant Audrey King with respect to the January 16, 2009 incident. (Id.) However, as the magistrate judge has found, plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable claim against defendant King in plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (See Doc. No. 31 at 5.) 2 1 Mason Cty., 927 F.2d 1473, 1479 (9th Cir. 1991) (noting that courts have broad discretion 2 regarding severance). Thus, in the interest of justice, the court will exercise its discretion to sever 3 the two claims. 4 Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, 5 1. This action shall proceed against defendants Redding and Blanco on plaintiff’s claims 6 under the Fourteenth Amendment relating to the alleged excessive use of force and 7 failure to protect with respect to an incident on January 21, 2011; 2. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Cosby and S. Valley 8 9 relating to the excessive use of force and failure to protect with respect to an incident 10 on January 16, 2009, are severed from this action; 11 3. The court directs the Clerk of the Court to open a new case entitled Gregory Ell 12 Shehee v. Cosby et al., with a new case number, which shall be assigned to Magistrate 13 Judge Stanley A. Boone and in which this order and all preceding docket entries shall 14 be entered4; 15 4. All other claims and defendants are dismissed from this action for failure to state a 16 cognizable claim for relief; and 17 5. The matter and the newly opened case are referred back to the assigned magistrate 18 19 20 judge for further proceedings including initiation of service of process in both cases. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 The court will leave to the assigned magistrate judge the determination of whether in order to avoid future confusion, plaintiff should be required to file amended complaints in both cases containing only the claim that is being presented in that particular case. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.