Ha v. U.S. Department of Justice et al, No. 1:2013cv01588 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Complaint for Failure to Follow a Court Order, and Directing Clerk of Court to Terminate Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/6/16. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THUAN HUY HA, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, Defendants. Case No.: 1:13-cv-1588-LJO-MJS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW A COURT ORDER, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION (Doc. 11) 17 18 19 Plaintiff Thuan Huy Ha is appearing pro se in this action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 et seq. 20 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 22 Recommendations (“F&Rs”), which recommended dismissal of this action for failure to follow a court 23 order. Doc. 11. The F&Rs were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be 24 filed within thirty days. Id. The thirty-day time frame has expired and no objections were filed. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 15, 2016, are adopted in full; and 2 2. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order; and 3 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill April 6, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.