United States of America v. Hansen et al, No. 1:2012mc00043 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER re Service of the 6 Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/6/2012. (Martinez, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America v. Hansen et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) ) MARK W. HANSEN and TAMI D. HANSEN, ) ) Respondents. ) ) __________________________________________) Case No. 1:12-mc-43 AWI GSA ORDER RE: SERVICE OF THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 18 Pending before the Court is the United States’ (“Petitioner”) Petition for Judicial Approval of 19 Internal Revenue Service Levy On a Principal Residence (“Petition”). (Doc. 1). Petitioner seeks to levy 20 upon Mark W. Hansen and Tami D. Hansen’s (“Respondents”) principal residence to satisfy 21 Respondents’ unpaid federal income tax liabilities, interest, and penalties for the 2000, 2003, 2005, 22 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 tax years. 23 On November 15, 2012, this Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that 24 the petition be granted. (Doc. 6). The parties were advised that objections to the Findings and 25 Recommendations shall be filed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Findings and 26 Recommendations. 27 A review of the docket reveals that Respondents were not served with the Findings and 28 Recommendations. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall serve both Mark Hansen W. Hansen and Dockets.Justia.com 1 Tami D. Hansen with this order, as well as the Findings and Recommendations dated November 15, 2 2012. (Docs. 6 and 7) at the following addresses : 3 4 1422 Celeste Avenue Clovis, California 93611 5475 East Ashcroft Avenue Fresno, California 93727 5 6 The parties shall file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations no later than December 7 28, 2012. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 8 Court’s order. Martinez v. Yist, 951 F. 2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 6i0kij 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 December 6, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
