(PC) Bryant v. Romero et al, No. 1:2012cv02074 - Document 89 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 56 , 63 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/16: Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for an alternative way of communicating with other inmates is DENIED. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN D. BRYANT, 12 13 14 No. 12-cv-02074-DAD-DLB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. ROMERO, et al., (Doc. Nos. 56, 63) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Kevin D. Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 26, 2012. (Doc. No. 1.) The 19 matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 20 Local Rule 302. 21 On December 9, 2015, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for 23 alternate way of communicating with other inmates be denied. (Doc. No. 63.) Those findings 24 and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto 25 were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On February 11, 2016, plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. 26 No. 84.) Defendants did not file a reply. 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the 1 1 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper legal analysis. As, the 2 assigned magistrate judge concluded, this court lacks jurisdiction to grant the specific relief which 3 plaintiff has requested. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations, filed December 9, 2015, are ADOPTED in full; 6 and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for an alternate way of 7 8 communicating with other inmates is DENIED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: March 9, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.