Coach, Inc. et al v. Sac A Main, et al, No. 1:2012cv00840 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 18 Findings and Recommendations Recommending the Grant of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 15 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/13/12. (Gonzalez, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Coach, Inc. et al v. Sac A Main, et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 COACH, INC., a Maryland corporation; COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland corporation, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00840-LJO-SMS ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THE GRANT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, v. SAC A MAIN, an unknown business entity; DANA LANTHIER, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, (Docs. 15 and 18) 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiffs Coach, Inc., and Coach Services, Inc., moved for Entry of Default Judgment 18 against Defendants Sac a Main and Dana Lanthier. The matter was referred to United States 19 Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 20 72-304. 21 On November 7, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations 22 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion be granted. The Findings and Recommendations provided 23 thirty days for the filing of objections. No party filed objections. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 25 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 26 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations, filed October 3, 2012, be adopted in full: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. 2 Plaintiffs are directed to submit proof of the financial basis for their calculation of the requested $100,000 statutory damages within seven days of this order. 3 2. Plaintiffs are further directed to submit a form of order setting forth appropriate 4 language for an injunction enjoining Defendants from using the Coach Marks in 5 connection with their sale and offering for sale of infringing products. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 December 13, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
