(PC) Mathis v. Chokatos et al, No. 1:2012cv00329 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/9/12. (Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Mathis v. Chokatos et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BENNIE MATHIS, 1:12-cv-329-LJO-MJS (PC) 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF J. CHOKATOS, M.D., et al., 12 (ECF No. 112) Defendants. 13 14 _______________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Bennie Mathis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations 20 recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief be denied. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff has 21 filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 14.) 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this 23 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 24 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 25 analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 /// 2 /// 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 21, 2012, are adopted in full; and 5 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 9 & 10) are DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 November 9, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
