(HC) Ortega v. Biter, No. 1:2012cv00070 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER Re 28 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying Petitioner's 25 Motion for an Order Granting Him Access to The Law Library, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/11/12. (Gonzalez, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Ortega v. Biter Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 MARK CURTIS ORTEGA, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 MARTIN BITER, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv—00070-AWI-SKO-HC ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 28) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING HIM ACCESS TO THE LAW LIBRARY (DOC. 25) 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a 18 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-303. 21 On November 1, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 22 recommendations that Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief 23 be denied. 24 of objections within thirty days and a reply within fourteen days 25 thereafter. 26 parties on the same date. 27 28 The findings and recommendations permitted the filing The findings and recommendations were served on all Although the time for filing objections has passed, no objections have been filed. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 2 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 3 The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and finds 4 that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record 5 and proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for 7 injunctive relief is DENIED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: 0m8i78 December 11, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
