Turner v. Hubbard et al
Filing
6
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not be Dismissed For Failure to Obey Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/30/2011. Response Due Within Eighteen Days. (Marrujo, C)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANTHONY R. TURNER,
9
10
11
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01670-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER
v.
SUSAN L. HUBBARD, et al.,
12
(Doc. 3)
Defendants.
13
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN EIGHTEEN
DAYS
/
14
15
Plaintiff Anthony R. Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
16
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights
17
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on October 3, 2011. Doc. 1.
18
On October 5, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff either to submit an application to proceed in
19
forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. Doc. 3. More than forty-five days
20
have passed, and Plaintiff has not responded or otherwise complied with the Court’s order.
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause why this action
22
should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order, within eighteen (18) days from the date
23
of service of this order. Failure to timely respond or to show cause will result in dismissal of this
24
action for failure to obey a court order.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
November 30, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
