(PC) Cisneros v. Olmos et al, No. 1:2011cv01639 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Denying Plaintiff's Motion For A Court Order (ECF Nos. 13 , 15 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/17/2012. (Fahrney, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cisneros v. Olmos et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORBERTO CISNEROS, 1:11-cv-01639-LJO-BAM (PC) 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A COURT ORDER Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 OLMOS, et al., (ECF Nos. 13, 15) 15 Defendants. 16 ________________________________/ 17 Plaintiff Norberto Cisneros is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 15, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 21 which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the 22 Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely 23 objection to the Findings and Recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 25 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 26 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 15, 2012, is adopted in full; and -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Court Order, filed June 18, 2012, is DENIED. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 66h44d 6 July 17, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
