Moncada v. Geokinetics, Inc. et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to continue the Motion to Dismiss hearing, document #5 , currently noticed for hearing on 11/21/2011 and CONTINUING it to 12/12/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Any opposition to the motion is due by 11/28/2011 with any reply to same due by 12/5/2011; order signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/1/2011. (Rooney, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 RUBEN MONCADA, MAGDALENO
ORTEGA, ROGELIO NAVA, JUAN GARCIA
12 GUZMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated, and the general public,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES, a Norwegian
16 corporation; GEOKINETICS, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1-20,
17
Defendant.
18
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01352-AWI-GSA
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT
PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES' MOTION
TO DISMISS
[Filed concurrently with Stipulation to
Continue Hearing and Briefing Schedule on
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss]
19
20
Based upon the concurrently filed Stipulation to Continue the hearing date and briefing
21 schedule of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Petroleum Geo-Services, it is hereby
22 ORDERED that:
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
11cv1352.o.move brief schedule.w pd
1
1.
The Motion to Dismiss scheduled on November 21, 2011 is continued to December
2 12, 2011. The opposition brief in connection with this motion shall be submitted no later than
3 November 28, 2011, and the reply brief shall be submitted no later than December 5, 2011.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6 0m8i78
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
November 1, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
