Northeast Properties, LLC v. Commerce Land Title Inc., et al
Filing
13
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, parties have not filed the form, Consent/Decline, why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the Court's September 14, 2011, Order. Written response to OSC due within 20 days of the date of service of this Order. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/14/2011. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
NORTHEAST PROPERTIES, LLC.,
6
7
Plaintiffs,
8
9
v.
10
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY of
TEXAS, DANA SAWYERS, and
COMMERCE LAND TITLE INC.,
11
Defendants’.
) 1:11-cv-01194 - - BAM
)
)
) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
13
On September 14, 2011, this Court issued an Order of Reassignment due to the retirement
14
of Senior United States District Court Judge Oliver W. Wanger. The Order withdrew Judge
15
Wanger’s assignment to the action and ordered the parties to affirmatively indicate whether they
16
would consent or decline to the jurisdiction of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. The
17
parties were ordered to complete and file a Consent/Decline form within thirty (30) days. Over
18
thirty (30) days have passed and all parties have not filed the required form.
19
Accordingly, the parties that have not filed the form are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE,
20
if any they have, why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the Court’s
21
September 14, 2011, Order. The parties SHALL file a written response to this Order to Show
22
Cause within twenty (20) days of the date of service of this Order. Alternatively, the parties may
23
comply with this Order to Show Cause by filing the required Consent/Decline form within
24
twenty (20) days of the date of service of this Order.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 14, 2011
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?