-GBC (PC) Miller v. Cate et al, No. 1:2011cv01111 - Document 56 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 51 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Defendants Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan's 15 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/18/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GBC (PC) Miller v. Cate et al Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 REGINALD DARRELL MILLER, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-01111-LJO-GBC (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS AHLIN, OWENS, AND SREENIVASAN’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. 11 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 12 Docs. 15 & 51 Defendants. 13 / 14 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action 15 removed by Defendants. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 16 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 17 On July 15, 2011, Defendants Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan filed a Motion to Dismiss. On 18 September 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations, recommending 19 granting Defendants Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has not submitted 20 any objections to the Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 21 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 22 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 23 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations, filed September 23, 2011, in 26 full; 27 2. Defendants Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan’s Motion to Dismiss, filed July 15, 2011, 28 is GRANTED; Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Defendants Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan are DISMISSED from this action; and 2 4. Plaintiff’s claims as to Ahlin, Owens, and Sreenivasan are DISMISSED without 3 prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: b9ed48 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 18, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
