Statzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
ORDER re Extension of Time to Submit Plaintiff's Confidential Brief signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/7/2011. (Bradley, A)
<![CDATA[
1 Sengthiene Bosavanh, Esq. #249801
Milam Law
2 948 11th Street, Suite 17
Modesto, California 95354
3 (209) 576-0817
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10
James Statzer,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.1:11-cv-00815-LJO-GSA
ORDER RE: EXTENSION
12 Commissioner of Social Security
OF TIME TO SUBMIT
Defendant.
PLAINTIFF'S CONFIDENTIAL BRIEF
13
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that Plaintiff be granted a
14
first-time 30-day extension of time to submit a confidential brief. The extension is requested
15
due to Plaintiff’s attorney’s workload demands and the number and complexity of the issues
16
in this case. The current due date for Plaintiff's Confidential Brief is November 4, 2011. The
17
new due date will be December 5, 2011. The scheduling order should be modified
18
accordingly.
19
Dated: November 4, 2011
/s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh
20
SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH, ESQ.
21
Attorney for Plaintiff
22 Dated: November 4, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
23
24
By: /s/ David W. Lerch
(as authorized by Lynn Harada on behalf of
David W. Lerch via e-mail)
DAVID W. LERCH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
ORDER
The Court adopts the stipulation. The scheduling order issued on May 19, 2011 is
3 modified accordingly. Plaintiff shall have an additional thirty days to submit a confidential
4 letter brief. All other dates in the scheduling order shall remain in effect.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
6i0kij
November 7, 2011
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
