Moore v. Vinod et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/23/2011. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/30/2011 is CONTINUED 1/4/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Bradley, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
Spencer C. Skeen, SBN 182216
James C. Fessenden, SBN 238663
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
4747 Executive Drive, Suite 1000
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone (858) 597-9600
Facsimile (858) 597-9601
Attorneys for Defendants
Vinod Nijhavan dba Handi Stop Market and
Pritpal Kaur
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
RONALD MOORE,
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
VINOD NIJHAVAN dba HANDI STOP
MARKET, PRITPAL KAUR,
19
Defendants.
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:11-CV-00726-AWI-GSA
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; ORDER
22
23
24
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Vinod Nijhavan dba Handi Stop
Market and Pritpal Kaur (“Defendants”) have reached a resolution in this case;
25
WHEREAS, previously-named defendant “DUSHAN S. BALICH as TRUSTEE OF
26
THE DUSHAN S. BALICH LIVING TRUST” has been dismissed from this matter, and
27
removed from the caption by amendment;
28
1-CV-00726-AWI-GSA
Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; Order
Page 1
SanDiego 81767.1
81837
1
2
WHEREAS, all remaining parties have reached a global resolution of this case effective
as to all parties;
3
WHEREAS, in light of the parties’ global resolution, the Mandatory Scheduling
4
Conference currently set for November 30, 2011 is unnecessary and will result in a
5
misallocation of judicial and attorney resources;
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, by and
7
through their respective counsel, that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter be
8
continued to a date after December 31, 2011 in order to allow the parties time to finalize
9
resolution of this case.
Date: November 22, 2011
10
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore,
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore
11
12
13
14
Date: November 23, 2011
15
FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP
s/Spencer C. Skeen
Spencer C. Skeen
James C. Fessenden,
Attorneys for Derfendants Vinod Nijahavan
Dba Handi Stop Market and Pritpal Kaur
16
17
18
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1-CV-00726-AWI-GSA
Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; Order
Page 2
SanDiego 81767.1
81837
1
ORDER
2
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing therefor,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for
4
November 30, 2011 be continued to January 4, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10 before
5
Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
10
11
November 23, 2011
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1-CV-00726-AWI-GSA
Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference; Order
Page 3
SanDiego 81767.1
81837
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
