Morales v. Valero California Retail Company
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/01/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
John Morales
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN MORALES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
VALERO CALIFORNIA RETAIL
COMPANY, dba VALERO CORNER
STORE,
Defendant.
17
) No. 1:11-CV-00569-DLB
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff John Morales and Defendant
19
Valero California Retail Company, dba Valero Corner Store, the parties to this action, by and
20
through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
21
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
22
Date: November 1, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
23
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Morales
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
Morales v. Valero California Retail Company, dba Valero Corner Store
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed] Order
Page 1
1
Date: November 1, 2011
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
2
3
/s/ Garrett R. Wynne
Garrett R. Wynne, Attorneys for
Defendant Valero California
Retail Company, dba Valero Corner Store
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
The parties having so stipulated,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
/s/ Dennis
November 1, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
14
15
L. Beck
3b142a
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Morales v. Valero California Retail Company, dba Valero Corner Store
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed] Order
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
