-SMS (PC) Antonio P. Youmans v. Gardner et al, No. 1:2011cv00240 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action, With Prejudice, For Failure to State a Claim; ORDER Counting Dismissal as a Strike Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/29/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
-SMS (PC) Antonio P. Youmans v. Gardner et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ANTONIO P. YOUMANS, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00240-LJO-SMS PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM v. W. GARDNER, et al., (ECF No. 14) 13 Defendants. ORDER COUNTING DISMISSAL AS A STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G) 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Antonio P. Youmans (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 18 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On May 10, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending 20 that the action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The parties were given thirty days within 21 which to file objections, and none were filed. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 23 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 24 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The findings and recommendations, filed May 10, 2011, is adopted in full; 27 2. This action, is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim 28 upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and 2 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 66h44d June 29, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.