Davis v. Social Service Coordinators, Inc.
Filing
38
SCHEDULING ORDER. 1) Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later than March 1, 2012; 2) The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before Nove mber 30, 2011; 3) Class certification discovery shall be completed by no later than March 30, 2012; 4) The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than April 30, 2012; 5) Any opposition shall be filed by no later than May 31, 2012; 6) Any reply brief shall be filed by no later than June 15, 2012; 7) The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than July 18, 2012, at 8:15 a.m. before the Honorable District Judge Lawrence O'Neill in Courtroom 4; 8) Following the District Court's decision on Plaintiff's motion for classcertification, the Court, as necessary, will set a status conference to set further scheduling dates and discuss issues related to discovery raised by the parties at the initial scheduling conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2011. (Timken, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
LISA DAVIS,
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
SOCIAL SERVICE COORDINATIORS,
INC., et. al.,
14
Defendants.
) 1:10-cv-02372 LJO SKO
)
)
)
)
)
)
) SCHEDULING ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
17
On November 8, 2011, a scheduling conference was held. Alex Tomasevic, Esq.,
18
appeared telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff. Erin McLaughlin, Esq., appeared telephonically
19
on behalf of Defendants.
20
The Court set the following deadlines:
21
1)
no later than March 1, 2012.1
22
23
Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed
2)
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ.
24
25
26
27
28
1
The parties are advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings by
4/5/2011 does not reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if
necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the
amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d
604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1)
prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman
v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).
1
1
P. 26(a)(1) on or before November 30, 2011.
2
3)
Class certification discovery shall be completed by no later than March 30, 2012.
3
4)
The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than April 30, 2012.
4
5)
Any opposition shall be filed by no later than May 31, 2012.
5
6)
Any reply brief shall be filed by no later than June 15, 2012.
6
7)
The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than July 18, 2012, at
7
8:15 a.m. before the Honorable District Judge Lawrence O’Neill in Courtroom 4.
8
8)
9
Following the District Court’s decision on Plaintiff’s motion for class
certification, the Court, as necessary, will set a status conference to set further
10
scheduling dates and discuss issues related to discovery raised by the parties at the
11
initial scheduling conference.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated:
ie14hj
November 10, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
