Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER Granting Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/17/2011. (Case Management Deadline: 12/15/2011). (Leon-Guerrero, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MONTE Y. SHAW,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:10-cv-02350 JLT
ORDER GRANTING THIRTY DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
SERVE A CONFIDENTIAL LETTER BRIEF
(Doc. 16)
On November 15, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation for Plaintiff Monte Y. Shaw
18
(“Plaintiff”) to have an extension forty-five days to serve Defendant with a confidential letter brief.
19
(Doc. 16). However, the Scheduling Order entered in this action allows a single thirty-day extension
20
by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 4-1 at 4). Any further requests to modify the Scheduling Order
21
“must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” Id.
22
Importantly, a scheduling order “is not a frivolous piece of paper, idly entered, which can be
23
cavalierly disregarded without peril.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 610
24
(9th Cir. 1992). The deadlines are considered “firm, real and are to be taken seriously by parties and
25
their counsel.” Shore v. Brown, 74 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1260, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94828
26
at *7 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2009).
27
28
The parties fail to explain or demonstrate good cause of an extension beyond the thirty days
permitted by stipulation in the Scheduling Order. Consequently, the extension of time is granted for
1
1
2
3
thirty days, rather than the stipulated forty-five days.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff SHALL serve Defendant with a
confidential letter brief on or before December 15, 2011.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: November 17, 2011
9j7khi
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?