Dominguez v. State of California Department of Corrections, No. 1:2010cv02146 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/4/201 adopting 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
Dominguez v. State of California Department of Corrections Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLEN PAUL DOMINGUEZ, 12 1:10-cv-02146-LJO-SMS 13 vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11) 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 15 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE Defendant. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 The matter was referred On March 16, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and 23 Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which 24 contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings 25 and Recommendation were to be filed within ten (10) days. 26 date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate 27 Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. 28 // To 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2 § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this 3 case. 4 the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and 5 by proper analysis. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 16, 2011, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 9 2. This entire action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for 10 plaintiff’s failure to follow the Court’s order(s) and rules and 11 failure to prosecute; and, 12 3. The Clerk of Court administratively CLOSE this action. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: 66h44d April 4, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.