Sosa v. Kaur
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL of Action, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/6/11: The action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jesus Sosa
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESUS SOSA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
PRITPAL KAUR, an individual,
15
Defendant.
16
17
) No. 1:10-CV-02142-OWW-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jesus Sosa and Defendant
19
Pritpal Kaur, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to
20
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with
21
prejudice in its entirety.
22
Date: June 6, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
23
24
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Jesus Sosa
25
26
27
/
28
/
Sosa v. Kaur
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 1
1
Date: June 6, 2011
FISHMAN, LARSEN, GOLDRING &
ZEITLER
2
3
4
/s/ Amanda Bishop
Amanda S. Bishop, Attorneys
for Defendant Pritpal Kaur
5
6
ORDER
7
8
The parties having so stipulated,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
15
16
17
June 6, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
emm0d64h
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Sosa v. Kaur
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?