Fair Housing Council of Central California, Inc. et al v. Nunez et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/15/2011. ( Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Hearing previously set for 6/17/2011 has been CONTINUED to 6/24/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck) (Figueroa, O)
<![CDATA[
1 Daniel L. Harralson, Esq., #109322
DANIEL L. HARRALSON LAW CORPORATION
2 Post Office Box 26688
Fresno, California 93729-6688
3 Telephone: (559)486-4560
4
Facsimile: (559)486-4500
5 Attorney for Defendant: HENRY D. NUNEZ
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF
CALIFORNIA, INC., NELIDA
12 MENDIOLA, MARIA NAVA and
MARTHA LEMOS,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
)
)
HENRY NUNEZ and MINNIE AVILA,
)
17
)
Defendants.
)
18 ____________________________________)
16
vs.
Case No:
1:10-CV-02073-LJO-DLB
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY RESPONSES
ORDER
Hearing:
Date:
Time:
Room:
June 24, 2011
9:00 a.m.
DLB
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties to continue the Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion
to Compel Discovery Responses from June 17, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. to and until June 24, 2011 at 9:00
a.m. in Room DLB before Magistrate Dennis L Beck, Magistrate Judge of the United States District
Court, Eastern District of California.
24
25 Date: __June 14, 2011__________________
26
27
28
By:
_____/S/____________________________
Daniel Harralson, Attorney for
Defendant, HENRY D. NUNEZ
1
2
Date: __June 14, 2011__________________
By:____/S/____________________________
_
3
Christopher Brancart,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 15, 2011
/s/ Dennis
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
3b142a
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
