Delgado v. Hopstop, Inc. et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL of 2 Action with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/7/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Daniel Delgado
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL DELGADO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
HOPSTOP, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
) No. 1:10-CV-01897-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado and
19
Defendants Hopstop, Inc., and Henry J. Imwalle Jr. and Martha R. Imwalle, Trustees of the
20
Imwalle 1997 Trust, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that
21
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be
22
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
23
Date: June 7, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
24
25
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado
26
27
28
///
Delgado v. Hopstop, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 1
1
Date: June 7, 2011
2
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS E.
FRANCIS, P.C.
3
4
/s/ Thomas E. Francis
Thomas E. Francis, Attorney for Defendants
Hopstop, Inc. and Henry J. Imwalle Jr. and
Martha R. Imwalle, Trustees of the Imwalle
1997 Trust
5
6
7
8
ORDER
9
10
The parties having so stipulated,
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
12
Dated:
13
14
June 7, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Delgado v. Hopstop, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
