Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER to extend time to answer signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/23/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney 5 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Kathryn.Watson@ssa.gov 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MICHELLE LEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 1:10-CV-01550-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, and 20 21 with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s 22 Complaint be extended 30 days from July 2, 2011 to Monday, August 1, 2011. This is Defendant’s 23 second request for an extension of time. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Defendant requests the additional time to review and respond. 2 Respectfully submitted, 3 4 5 Dated: June 22, 2011 /s/ Steven Rosales (As authorized via email) STEVEN G. ROSALES Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: June 23, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 6 7 8 9 10 11 /s/ Kathryn R. Watson KATHRYN R. WATSON Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj June 23, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?